Come Learn Along With Me: Is There a Cure for Autism?

Latest on NAET autism protocol

Posted By Phyllis on January 26, 2010

“Shannon” has been doing NAET more or less weekly for more than six months, I believe.  A reader has asked for an update.

I am amazed at how this technique helps Shannon (daughter with Asperger’s). The practitioner is an RN, Becca Skrainka, who has been working with NAET for at least 10 years and goes to conferences and workshops all the time. I believe she is one of the prime practitioners in the country, but certainly in St. Louis.

The reader asked whether we started with an allergy test. We did not start with an allergy test, but dived right into the protocol. I think the reason is that NAET can benefit anyone–we all have glitches in our immune system. That’s what allergy is, a malfunction of the immune system. In particular, there is an autism protocol, which Becca has recently begun for Shannon. Before that, Becca was working on neutralizing previously undetected allergies to yeast and other miscellaneous items in Shannon’s diet.  Shannon’s acne, present since puberty (she is 22), is now gone. I am REALLY happy about that!  Shannon is also off the large dose of zoloft, 100 mg per day (she weighs 120 lb), that she had been on for at least 8 years, for anxiety.

Without the zoloft, she did have some trouble with anxiety last week–she was in a stressful situation with a new job, new evening class, and a second job too. Becca was able to address that with an NAET treatment, something that works on irregularities in the brain chemicals like serotonin. That’s part of the autism protocol I am sure.  Shannon came back from Becca’s all smiles.

So, how does NAET work?  It uses Chinese medicine theory, which is a bit mind boggling for us western linear thinkers.  Somehow harnesses the body’s energy at meridians and nodes, or something or other. It works similarly to acupuncture. The important thing to me is that it does work, and it’s an answer to many years of prayer.

Worried about vaccination dangers?

Posted By Phyllis on December 26, 2009

I ran across a very well-reasoned article written by a homeschooling mother who happens to be a naturopathic doctor. She decided not to vaccinate, and wrote about her reasons.

http://homeschoolnewslink.com/up-articles/vaccinev3i6.asp

Danielle J. Emel, ND, PhD, discusses the germ theory that Pasteur composed, and which he later repudiated. The germ theory underlies the idea of vaccinations.  Here is what she says:

Vaccinations are based on the germ theory, which says that bacteria/germs cause diseases. However, during the time that Pasteur introduced his “germ theory” (1822-1895), Bechamp demonstrated that bacteria function in whatever medium they find themselves, changing shapes and functions with the medium. In other words, Pasteur theorized that germs cause diseases and Bechamp that diseases cause germs. (Flies are attracted by rotten meat, but do not cause rotten meat). Claude Bernard, considered to be the father of modern medicine, sided with Bechamp, saying that the general condition of the body, known as the terrain, was the principal factor in disease. Pasteur eventually rejected his germ theory, and on his deathbed is reported to have said: “Bernard was right. The seed is nothing, the soil is everything.”

Mainstream medicine continues to debunk autism-vaccine link

Posted By Phyllis on December 7, 2009

Medical news sources continue to debunk any link between autism and vaccines, saying there is good research that has closed the issue.

For example, a recent issue of the Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, reported in ScienceDaily.com, reviews existing research on vaccine safety in regard to autism. It looks only at the two most-published causation theories, mercury and MMR. It concludes that “there is not convincing scientific evidence supporting a relationship between vaccines and autism.” Therefore, the headline trumpets that there is “no scientific link” between autism and vaccines.

The logic of this conclusion is obviously faulty.

1. There are many other variables about the way vaccines are made and the schedules that are used. Only two variables have been eliminated: thimerosal mercury and measles virus found in the MMR.

2. Since research to date hasn’t identified a link, there isn’t any link.  Research to date is very narrow in scope. No one has dared to do a simple epidemiological study that compares autism rates in kids who have been vaccinated with autism rates in kids who haven’t been.

Meanwhile, the anecdotal evidence mounts.

Can we trust our doctors on vaccines?

Posted By Phyllis on December 5, 2009

Do childhood vaccines cause autism? If you listen to a variety of critics, the answer is possibly yes; the research hasn’t been done, so we can’t say definitely yes or no.  The anecdotal evidence from parents is overwhelming. But if you listen to your doctor and the CDC and vaccine makers he or she listens to, the answer is no.

So, do H1N1 vaccines cause miscarriages?  The anecdotal evidence is piling up.  Again, the studies haven’t been done; no one really knows whether they do or not.  (Actually, we are the guinea pigs for this shot.) But the doctors, CDC, and vaccine makers say pregnant women should take the vaccine.

Dr. Joseph Mercola’s research on the safety of the H1N1 vaccine has led him to “Swedish, Japanese, and Chinese health officials who have also reported a number of serious side effects, including deaths of people who received the H1N1 vaccine.”  Do we hear of U.S. health officials reporting a number of serious side effects? No. The serious side effects in the U.S. aren’t being logged or taken seriously because maybe something else caused them. In fact, the cases of H1N1 flu aren’t being logged either. A  number of months ago, health officials decided to stop testing for and counting H1N1 flu cases because, after all, there is a pandemic on.

Mercola calls the medical system’s approach to vaccines “Russian roulette.”  It’s true.  Doctors expect a certain percentage of people to react badly to any vaccine. But as the “herd immunity” is protected, it’s supposed to be worth the risk.  We need to ask ourselves: is it worth the risk?  After all, we are the ones carrying the risk. We parents sign waivers when our children are vaccinated.  The system depends on this.

It’s not a good system. Perhaps we don’t want our kids and ourselves to be guinea pigs. Herd immunity might be important for a major disease like smallpox, but for minor diseases like measles, mumps, and rubella, and H1N1 influenza,  perhaps we would prefer the risk of the disease to the risk of bad effects from the vaccine.  To make these decisions, we need to be informed. And it would help if the laws were changed to make it easier for conscientious objection to vaccines, as an autism parents group is seeking to do with a ballot initiative in Oregon.

Can we trust our doctors on vaccines? No.

Sources:

Organic Health Adviser on H1N1 vaccine-related miscarriages:

http://organichealthadviser.com/archives/shocking-h1n1-swine-flu-vaccine-miscarriage-stores-from-pregnant-women-tell-your-doctors-that-vaccines-and-pregnancy-do-not-mix

Joseph Mercola:

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/12/05/Swine-Flu-Shot-Side-Effects-Beginning-to-Take-Their-Toll.aspx

Oregon ballot initiative:

http://www.ageofautism.com/2009/11/autism-a-simple-plan.html

Parents seek ballot initiative on autism-vaccine link

Posted By Phyllis on November 29, 2009

hypodermic

The battle lines have been drawn for at least five years now, and not much is happening. Many parents of autistics are convinced that vaccines may be to blame. The trend of more and more autism, after all, tracks with the trend of more and more childhood vaccines.  Now it’s 1 in 100 kids in America that have autism, according to some measures, compared to 1 in 10,000 40 years ago.

And the medical establishment, convinced that vaccines are safe, looked into a couple of sub-theories about vaccines and autism (that the measles virus in the MMR causes autism, and that mercury in vaccines causes autsim), declared them invalid, and apparently isn’t planning to do anything else.

In particular, the medical establishment isn’t doing the obvious study: comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated populations and checking autism rates. Why would they? They’re convinced vaccines are safe. And the mainstream media is parroting the CDC and others. Why wouldn’t they? They’re convinced doctors know what they are talking about.

But many, many parents of autistics are convinced that the doctors and vaccine-makers don’t know what they are talking about, and that vaccines caused their child’s autism. (After all, no tests have been done of the safety of multiple vaccines, just individual ones.) In many of these families, subsequent children have remained unvaccinated–and are not autistic.

So how many of these families are there? Nobody knows. The study looking for autism cases in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations has to be done, and some autism parent groups are teaming up to try to get it done. They’re also hoping to get a viable national dialogue going.

Generation Rescue, Age of Autism, and Talk About Curing Autism, three of these autism advocacy groups, are teaming up to gather donations to put the issue into the public square.  According to Age of Autism’s Kent Heckenlively, liability concerns limit how much exposure a talk show host wants to give here-say items like parent reports on vaccinations. But once the item becomes a political issue, as with a ballot initiative, it becomes fair game.

Organizers hope the vehicle will be a ballot initiative in Oregon, a plan announced November 16. Exactly what would be on the ballot isn’t determined yet. There is a long list of possibilities in Heckenlively’s article. One of the major ones, though, is requiring the government of Oregon to fund a study that compares autism rates in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Another is permitting waiver of vaccine requirements because of individual philosophy. A third is requiring that the MMR vaccine be made available as three separate vaccines, to be taken at least a week apart.

Why Oregon? The organizers favored California but decided that a campaign in Oregon would cost a lot less–”just” $2 million to $5 million.  So they’re asking for donations from people like you and me to get the issue into the public arena.

Why is this initiative a good idea? The other venue, the vaccine court, isn’t proving a good place to air the issue. The vaccine court was set up by Congress as it created a liability shield for vaccine makers. The court controls a liability fund. In a Feb. 12 decision, the vaccine court ruled that lawyers for three cases, representing 5,000 autism vaccine claims, had not proven that autism was caused in these cases by MMR or thimerosal. (These are the two sub-issues that have been examined and rebutted by studies.) But the court had required that the lawyers come up with a specific causation theory. It couldn’t handle the case that vaccines could be causing autism, but no one knows exactly why at this time. This is where we stand. One hypothesis is that there appear to be “too many, too soon”–too many shots (35), too soon in a child’s life (starting on day 1). But that’s not specific enough for the vaccine court.

The autism parents are trying to get the whole issue out into the public square. They’re not the richest folks in the world–most of them are strapped, trying to pay for supplements, gluten-free diets, and so on. Can you help?

You can donate at Generation Rescue’s website. When you get to the donation page, click that you want to make the donation in honor of somebody, then during Step 2 place the word “Ballot” in the personal note section so your donation can be directed to this cause.

Photo credit:

Flu vaccine injures cheerleader; “autism quack” brings her back

Posted By Phyllis on November 23, 2009

Desiree Jennings, a Washington Redskins cheerleader, took a seasonal flu shot in the summer. Days later she developed muscle dystonia, suffering seizures and uncontrollable muscle twitching that disabled her totally–unless she was jogging or walking backward. So strange. I saw a video about her online not too long ago.

Generation Rescue organizers saw it too and referred her to a controversial autism practitioner who has helped her tremendously. This is Rashid Buttar, MD, of Charlotte, NC, who is no longer affiliated with Defeat Autism Now! (DAN) and has some unusual protocols, even for autism practitioners.  His high fees draw fire, along with his controversial practices and lack of traditional certifications.

But in Desiree’s case, he has proven his value. In the intervening time, she got a lot worse; in fact, by the time she got to Dr. Buttar she appeared to be dying of acute respiratory distress, according to Fox News. Using hyperbaric oxygen chambers and IV administration of nutrients, he treated her, and she got a lot better.  The problem was a toxic reaction to the shot, including mercury toxicity, he told Fox News.  He expects her to fully recover with continued treatment.

The Web sites I looked up that mention Dr. Buttar contain some fairly incendiary language.  He is particularly criticized for charging high fees.

What this whole debate needs is some basic information so we can stop slinging mud and look at the facts. I am hoping someone will do the study I have been calling for: comparing autism outcomes for vaccinated vs. unvaccinated populations. As I noted in my last post, a study similar to that WAS done– looking for increase in allergies, asthma, eczema, and hay fever in vaccinated populations. In fact they found a statistically significant increase in those conditions.

Vaccines are NOT proven safe. The basic research on them has NOT been done. Let’s do it.

http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/health/desiree-jennings-flu-shot-reaction-111909

Study compares vaccinated and unvaccinated populations

Posted By Phyllis on November 14, 2009

Joseph Mercola, DO, has a massive emailing list about health issues. He has recently taken up the vaccine question, which I am very happy about. He has a new posting in which he interviews a pediatrician, Larry Palevsky, who regrets having vaccinated children after carefully reviewing the science involved:  http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/14/Expert-Pediatrician-Exposes-Vaccine-Myths.aspx

In the posting, Mercola brings up a favorite topic of mine: that new research should compare vaccinated and unvaccinated populations, in order to understand possible adverse effects of vaccines. Seems like a no-brainer, but it isn’t happening, possibly because the medical establishment is full of conflicts of interest.  Mercola found a study that did in fact compare vaccinated and non-vaccinated populations–not for autism, but for allergies, asthma, eczema, and hay fever. This study, published in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology in April 2005, found statistically significant increases in the number of cases of these conditions in the vaccinated and partly-vaccinated groups as opposed to the never-vaccinated groups, according to Mercola. The researchers were puzzled, because they had been told vaccines were safe.

I have been calling for research comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, looking at incidence of autism.  Others are too. Since this isn’t happening with the medical establishment, a parents’ group is stepping in to fill the void. The National Vaccine Information Center has gathered $100,000 so far for some unbiased research, said Mercola.  I am very happy to hear this.

Also in this newsletter, Mercola draws a bead on the concept of herd immunity, which the vaccine proponents cite as the reason for vaccinations.  If most of the population has been vaccinated, the virus is likely to be stopped in its tracks, according to this theory. Go below an unknown percentage, and the likelihood of disease occurrence increases.

Pediatrician Larry Palevsky, interviewed by Mercola, pointed out that the virus doesn’t actually go away if the population is mostly immunized. It’s still there, in our bodies and our environments, but the vaccinated people aren’t (supposed to be) reacting to it.  So since it’s still there, the virus can hardly be stopped in its tracks for those who aren’t vaccinated. There is no herd immunity, Palevsky maintains.

Interesting!! I recommend you read this posting from Mercola and sign up for his newsletter.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/14/Expert-Pediatrician-Exposes-Vaccine-Myths.aspx

NAET and Autism: A Personality Change!!!

Posted By Phyllis on November 13, 2009

I am now fully convinced that there is a huge link between the immune system and autism.  My evidence: my daughter “Shannon’s” positive response to NAET, an allergy elimination treatment that has its roots in Chinese medicine. Allergy is of course the immune system gone awry. So treatment to eliminate allergy also eliminates autism??? So strange.

Her positive response is this:  first her long-time acne was cured, and now she’s turned into a friendly old salt. She was formerly a cheerful young adult who was definitely ignorant of what you might be thinking, and therefore occasionally thoughtless, and normally wary. There has definitely been a personality change. A good friend of mine who sees her fairly seldom ran into her a week or two ago and expressed her amazement at Shannon’s friendliness. “You would NEVER know she has Asperger’s,” said the friend. “It used to be there, you could tell. But not now.”

Shannon has Asperger’s, diagnosed at age 11. She DEFINITELY was missing those mirror cells in the brain that let us know what the other person might be thinking.

For those of you who know her, talk to her and let me know what you think!

H1N1 Vaccine–To Take It Or Not?

Posted By Phyllis on November 3, 2009

Several friends have asked me whether I think they and/or their children should take the H1N1 vaccine.  My answer is “no.”  There’s just no reason to take such a big risk. The vaccine hasn’t been tested–we are the guinea pigs. If something goes wrong, we bear the risk, because of laws that protect vaccine manufacturers. And the swine flu isn’t terrible, contrary to news reports. There’s a lot of fear-mongering and thought manipulation going on. Let’s be rational!

Take a look at what Joseph Mercola. O.D., of Mercola.com says:

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/10/24/CBS-Reveals-that-Swine-Flu-Cases-Seriously-Overestimated.aspx

Here’s another post of note:

http://swineflu.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/10/06/Why-You-Should-NOT-Vaccinate-Your-Children-Against-the-Flu-This-Season.aspx

NAET treatments bearing fruit

Posted By Phyllis on October 23, 2009

Our daughter with Asperger’s, “Shannon,” age 22, has been undergoing NAET (Nambudripad’s allergy elimination treatments) more or less weekly for about four months, with a few gaps caused by vacations etc.  Her practitioner, Becca Skrainka, is following a step-by-step protocol that uses acupressure etc. to desensitize the person against a variety of potential allergens, one at a time.  Last week it was grains, and this week it was yeast.  One or both of these must have been a millstone for her, because now her acne is pretty much gone. She’s had difficulty with acne since puberty.  I am really happy about this, and I think she is too.

We’ll see if there are other effects noticed, and whether the effects continue. Becca says that people with a variety of ailments are helped by the NAET. Somehow the NAET strengthens the immune system, which is haywire in a variety of common ailments these days: fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, autism, and others. Stay tuned!